The Police, Quakers, and the Satanic Scare

Last Thursday, the Metropolitan police broke into Westminster Friends’ Meeting House to arrest six women members of the pressure group Youth Demand, which ironically probably helps to publicise them and encourages people to join their cause. Although their plans for action are interesting, I want to focus on another aspect of this situation and also compare it to the child abuse allegation farce which took place in the Orkneys at the end of the 1980s CE. Before that though, I want to talk about the place of Friends’ Meeting Houses and the Quakers in my life, mainly the one in Leicester.

The first time I darkened the doors of Leicester Friends’ Meeting House on Queens Road was in autumn 1986. At the time I had recently joined the Green Party and was also involved in hunt sabbing, animal liberation and the university Green group Leicester Environmental Action Force. It was dark and around 7:30 pm on a Thursday evening, and I was walking behind my friend Vicky whom I probably shouldn’t have been behind at that time of night, but you live and learn. At this point, she was for some reason constantly surprised when I turned up to this kind of thing, possibly because her image of me had been dominated by how I’d been over the previous year. Both she and I were on our way to a Supporters Of Greenpeace Leicester meeting, the first of many groups I’d be involved with there over the coming years. Other groups included Friends of the Earth, Leicester CND and, a few years later during the 1991 Gulf War, the Stop The War Coalition. As well as all that, we got married there in a humanist ceremony (well, sort of humanist – long story), went to a complementary medicine taster group, attended Yoga sessions, a parent and toddler group (abortively) and also Leicestershire Education Otherwise. I can’t quite remember, but I don’t think the Green Party or the animal welfare groups I was involved with ever went there, but it was a pretty central part of the alternative scene in Leicester, and particularly Clarendon Park, at the time. It was a venue used by lots of groups, with a tendency towards peace, sustainability, socialism, Green issues and to some extent anarchism. In general, the approaches taken by such groups accords with the Quaker world view. The donkey coöperation cartoon was outside on a board for many years, which seems to me to be pretty much in accordance with these organisations.

There was conflict, even aggressively so, within these groups. In particular the Stop The War Coalition was rife with friction because it involved peace groups and splinter communist groups trying to work together and soon after the end of the first Gulf War it fell apart. That was quite a shouty group, with the overt aggression largely coming from the smaller communist parties. There were members of the main Communist Party of Britain in the group, though, who were generally quiet and in fact didn’t advertise their communism. CND has many of that variety of communists within its ranks, but also people of a more spiritual bent. Supporters of Greenpeace Leicester was merely a fundraising body and in fact we got into trouble for trying to do more, so on the whole the same people worked within Friends of the Earth instead, meeting in the same place. There’s a conversation to be had about this, but not here. FoE also have their issues. Sarada and I concur in the opinion, also expressed by many others, that the more peace and well-being groups could do with being more politically-aware and the more overtly political groups could benefit from being more spiritual. Now I look back on it, the other stuff going on in Leicester at the time didn’t tend to organise from the building, and CND also had its own office, where I was office manager for a while, among other things. Leicester CND was slowly winding down over the whole period I was involved with it, which was from 1991 to about 2011, and was dominated by older people, mainly women. I preferred CND to the other organisations in the ’90s because of their spiritual tendencies. The revolution starts from within. It really helps the world if you become a better person.

That, then, is the kind of group you might expect to meet in a Friends’ Meeting House. Many Quakers don’t have their own premises for various reasons: there aren’t enough of them to afford one or it becomes a case of property ownership in the same way as many churches are saddled with expensive buildings which eat up the money which could be used to benefit the community and the vulnerable in Europe and beyond. That said, it’s a nice thing to have, and although they’re not Quakers themselves there is often quite an overlap in their memberships. In particular, Leicester CND had a lot of Quakers in it, which is not surprising because of the latter’s commitment to pacifism. CND is not a pacifist group although it does contain many such individuals. Quakers also tend to be older, as do members of many religious communities in Britain. Incidentally, I’m talking about Quakers in the “U”K here. What happens elsewhere is probably different. For instance, American Quakers often have what are called “programmed meetings” with singing and they don’t sit in circles.

The reason I’m saying all this is to put the incident in Westminster in context. It’s possible that Youth Demand has Quaker members but not inevitable. However, their witness and mission to pursue peace, justice and sustainability accords closely with the Quakers, and they belong under their umbrella. At a guess, Youth Demand probably don’t overlap with membership just because they’re young. Hence it’s an organisation using the centre, with whose aims the Quakers are likely to agree, but it isn’t a Quaker organisation. The situation is therefore that a place of worship hosting a planning meeting by a non-violent group was invaded by the police and their members were arrested.

I may have some of the details wrong but there is a page on the incident here from the British Quakers themselves which is worthwhile for cutting through the verbiage and spin of the mass media, although it has to be said also that the actual mass media coverage is quite sympathetic to the Quakers themselves. There were twenty police officers and six women were arrested for planning a now-criminalised Non-Violent Direct Action. Several aspects of this come to mind. One is the question of whether the police would’ve done the same thing with other places of worship. I heard someone yesterday claim that they wouldn’t have done this with a synagogue or a mosque. I personally think they would’ve done it with a mosque but the fact that synagogues are often guarded and have turnstiles would have made doing it in such a place difficult regardless of how it would’ve looked. I’m pretty sure they wouldn’t have done it to an Anglican, Methodist, Baptist, URC, Roman Catholic or Orthodox church. Regarding gurdwaras, they did actually use a SWAT team in Leicester to my knowledge because they thought the lives of the people within it, who were being held hostage, were in danger. I have no idea how heavy-handed they were. Bearing in mind the direct child abuse and murder which occurs in some churches, for instance when exorcisms have been performed on children, I would expect and in fact hope that they would intervene in such cases. So it isn’t completely out of order to do this, although the provocation would’ve probably been stronger. It’s also not proportionate, and it’s at least interesting that it seems to have been a woman-only group. The implication is that this action would’ve been sufficiently serious and reprehensible to warrant such a response, possibly partly as a deterrent to others.

I mentioned incidents of child abuse within churches. Although this usually calls to mind child sexual abuse, which is indeed a serious problem, I actually had exorcisms in mind. I have actually tried to help someone access exorcism, which they wanted for themselves, and it was difficult to do so due to their lack of association with any particular church. It doesn’t seem easy to get this service within the Episcopal Church. Without this milieu, however, things are sometimes different because some other churches are less reserved or cautious. A fifteen year old boy was drowned during an exorcism in Newham in 2012 and a two-year old was hit fatally in Wolverhampton more recently. It isn’t clear whether either was part of a church-sanctioned process, but these things do happen and the potential victims need to be protected. However, the separate issue of child sexual abuse linked with a general suspicion of Quakers was also called to mind by last week’s events.

This seems to have been almost forgotten today, which may be a good thing except that forgetting history risks repeating it, which in a sense is what’s happened here. You may, though, remember the Satanic panic of the ’80s and ’90s, which is how this was able to take place. I can remember the first time I noticed this in about 1979 when my mother showed me a list of what the London Healing Mission regarded as Satanic activities, including of course Yoga, which I was very keen on at the time. I wish I was still that keen. This initially included heavy metal music and roleplaying games, as in Dungeons And Dragons. Much more recently it included Harry Potter although that’s faded considerably nowadays. By the late ’80s, the focus was on the idea that communities were being infiltrated by Satanists who were engaging in widespread ritual abuse including child murder and sexual abuse. No evidence was ever found, but that didn’t stop a training course for the police being devised. The claim was meanwhile made of fifty thousand murders per year with expert disposal of the corpses. To put this in proportion, this is on the scale of the casualties of a major international war. All this was happening in North America. To quote some of the promoters of these claims, “no evidence can be evidence” and “the most dangerous groups are the ones we know nothing about. . .They are the real underground”. It was eventually concluded that the children involved were being interviewed in a manner which would encourage them to make up stories about being abused due to the poor quality of the questioning techniques, such as closed questions, and in therapy false memories were also created. Because children often deny being abused during interviews, the approach was to keep repeating the question, and it’s fairly simple to recognise even as an adult that that repetition is akin to Hitler’s technique of repeating a lie often enough for it to be accepted as true, a technique currently in use in the US. However, it beggars belief that anyone could have accepted that the process was taking place on such a gigantic scale. It’s the reverse of Holocaust denial in some ways: where are all the relatives of the Roma and Jewish people who were murdered in the Holocaust if they weren’t murdered? Conversely, how could there be tens of thousands of victims of systematic serial murder whose bodies are never recovered and whose absence is never noted by anyone? There were allegations of injuries which would’ve required emergency treatment but no evidence for them either.

In February 1990, the McEwen family in South Ronaldsay was almost broken apart by a dawn police raid on their home where four children were removed and taken into care on the Scottish mainland. A worker in the NSPCC had made the claim that in Britain four thousand children were murdered through Satanic ritual abuse annually. What had happened was that there had been conferences on Satanic ritual abuse in Britain, notably in Nottingham in connection with a genuine incest case in Broxtowe. Ten adults were jailed for this having been found guilty, but no suggestion of a Satanic element had been made at that time. This connection was made by a group of psychiatrists, social workers and an anthropologist specialising in occult rituals in Afrika. This was happening at a time of growth of evangelical Protestant churches in Britain, which led to the production of a training video called ‘Christian Response To The Occult’. Workers in children’s foster homes and foster parents recorded claims made by the children, which while beginning with accounts of their abuse in relatively prosaic terms tended to veer off into accounts of ritual abuse. There were attempts to explain this in any other way possible, because of the uncanny similarities between the claims. The social workers concluded that they’d uncovered an organised network of ritual abuse in Broxtowe. A checklist was used which contained a large number of non-specific signs of indicators such as bed-wetting, and the foster parents and others had used this as the basis for the interviews, so they’d ended up guiding the process through leading questions. While there was no factual basis for these claims, the fear of not listening to children when they report genuine abuse leads to swinging too far the other way.

By 1994, an inquiry had established that there was no evidence at all for the claims. It’s worth noting that this sounds very like Pizzagate. Now I have a problem. I’ve ransacked the internet for fair accounts of the situation regarding the Ronaldsay Quakers without any success, so I’m going to have to try to reconstruct this from rather ancient personal memories. What I can remember is that someone of national significance among the Quakers was contacted by a worried member of the meeting who expressed her concern that police action was liable to bring the meeting and the wider Quaker movement into disrepute without any firm basis for that. She was reluctant to say more, but in the end she talked about how the police suspected them of Satanic ritual abuse. In particular, she said that the police were suspicious of the Quaker practice of sitting in circles and waiting for the Holy Spirit (as I put it – many Quakers such as atheists and Buddhists would probably disagree with this characterisation but it’s hard to think of a personally authentic way to describe it more diplomatically) to move them to give ministry. This was apparently something the police and many of their associates were unfamiliar with and attributed evil intent to. Putting my evangelical Protestant hat on, something Quakers would disapprove of, I’m familiar with the claim that allowing silence and emptiness of this kind is liable to give Satan a way into the group, and I wonder if this was their take on this. I honestly don’t know what happened in much detail, and I’m finding this quite frustrating right now.

These two incidents, the Westminster invasion and the Orkney Satanic panic, to me both have elements of othering by the authorities, something with which the Quakers will be very familiar as they’ve endured it for centuries. The very heart of Quaker practice, of sitting in circles and waiting to be moved by the Spirit, was attacked by the establishment back in the early ’90s, and last week the general Quaker ethos was attacked in the same way. I’ve long since shed the illusion that the current Westminster government is worthy of being described as Labour and I note the extreme keenness and conformity with which they applied the Tory law introduced in 2022 to enable this kind of thing to happen. But it’s the Tory party which is supposed to be about God, King and Country, and by extension the Anglican church, which is after all also a broad church, much of which would back the actions of the pressure group in question, but the question arises of why a party founded partly by Methodists would decide to persecute Quakers for supporting peaceful protest against the global suicide (yes, it’s a moral crime in this context, but not usually, so it’s “suicide” for the purposes of this paragraph) pact. Why are we in a situation where a group renowned for its non-violence and tireless work for peace is repeatedly treated in this way? And why haven’t we made progress on this since Thatcher’s time in office?

But there’s more.

Quakers seek to see the spark of God in everyone, and they mean that in a positive way which anti-theists may find hard to perceive. I think it was Viktor Frankl who said that the line between good and evil runs down the centre of the human heart. We all have within us the potential for peace and violence in his view. I’m not sure I’d go that far, but the fact remains that this situation is likely to provoke anger in those who have been persecuted, directly and indirectly. There is a potential antidote to this, because the very police officers and social workers involved in these incidents are human, and as such there’s that of God in them too.

It reminded me of two other incidents, and again I’m having to rely on somewhat shaky memories. One is of an incident regarding the peace movement and the police, possibly on Menwith Hill or Faslane – it’s vague. A group of people were trying to project peaceful and healing energy to the police force involved in this conflict. The metaphysical basis for this may be questionable but bear with me. One of the male police officers involved in protecting the base burst into tears in this incident, and it was found later that he’d been at Hillsborough, where the fatal crush had happened in the football ground and after which South Yorkshire Police spread false stories criticising the fans, as did the Sun newspaper. Whatever his involvement in that, he had been emotionally traumatised by what he witnessed because guess what, police officers are also human beings. The other incident was much more recent and involved another police officer who was guarding a fossil fuel facility of some kind – I’m having to dredge my memory here, sorry about any mistakes. One of the protestors mentioned to her that Just Stop Oil, if it was them, were among other things trying to protect her children’s and other descendants’ future, and once again, she was in tears. I don’t know the details of this incident. It could’ve been to do with a family tragedy, some other experience or maybe the interpretation given is correct. It was in any case a remarkable incident, once again revealing what might be called the humanity of police officers. Because there is that of God in everyone.

But there is also a police officer in everyone. By this I don’t mean a “bobby on the beat”, although maybe there is, but someone more like a member of the Special Patrol Group or the Carabinieri. We all have an inner fascist boot boy too, and we need to be conscious of it.

I was sitting in a sociology lecture once about the 1981 inner city riots, and suddenly had the thought that the police were not just Thatcher’s Army but also ordinary human beings with romantic relationships and families, and the thought had such a profound affect on me that it literally gave me vertigo. It made my head spin. I feel bad about that incident because it clearly means I was seriously objectifying the people concerned, but of course it’s true. When the Met broke into the Friends’ Meeting House in Westminster the other day, what they did was reprehensible and bizarre, but after it they presumably went home to their families, read their children bedtime stories, did the vacuuming, made love to their spouses and watched telly with them. They are also human. It shouldn’t need saying, but we need to have the mental reach to recognise the temptation to other and behave like them in ourselves and condemn and work against that in us as well as in them, and also to do what we can to see their divine nature, and this is very difficult.

I feel like this is a bit of a platitude, sorry.

The Peace Movement And Me Part II – My Work With CND

The Menwith Hill Radomes

By the time I got around to being active in CND 1991, its membership was probably in decline, which had a number of effects on its atmosphere. The people still actively involved were kind of a hard core of members who were particularly committed to the cause, and took a deeper, more philosophical approach to the ideal of peace, something which I hadn’t seen so much in FoE, Greenpeace or the Green Party. I found this quite impressive, and it’s also the case that with CND, people were more prepared to take direct action against things and go to prison for their beliefs, although this is obviously also true in other situations as with animal liberation. Sarada’s experience begins much earlier than mine, and she may be aware of how the organisation had been in its heyday.

Speaking of Sarada, at the time our relationship was still in the future and a misunderstanding occurred which I didn’t clear up definitively until many years later. Many Leicester CND members were leaving the organisation because of our opposition to the Gulf War in 1991 as I got involved, one of whom was Sarada, officially speaking. Much later I found out that this was nothing to do with her, but that he partner had resigned instead as she was not in the country at the time. However, before this was resolved this temporarily placed her in the “outer darkness” for me because it appeared to me that she had supported the war.

1991 was the best and the worst of years for me. It was extremely traumatic to see the whole country so enthusiastically support the war, and it also seemed very much to me that we’d made no progress since 1914, as the rhetoric used I found strongly reminiscent of that time. The Marxist historian Eric Hobsbawn spoke of the “short twentieth century”, which he saw as stretching between those two years and ending with the breakup of the Soviet Union. I don’t know the details of his analysis, but it struck me that the progress one associates with that period was utterly trashed from the end of the 1970s onwards in this country and that this became starkly demonstrated in the outrage of that war, and even more in its popular support. My reaction was one of utter despair.

But I want to focus on CND itself. Due to the rather depleted membership, I found myself becoming office manager and later chair of Leicester CND, and at the same time I was translating German papers and articles for the Campaign Against the Arms Trade (CAAT) and the Trust for Research and Education into the Arms Trade (TREAT). I also became newsletter editor, regularly staffed the stall and and just generally did a lot for them, although it must also be observed that I didn’t do it particularly well. Clearly I had my strengths but the trouble with being in a declining organisation is that you can’t necessarily stick to the areas you do best in and I found myself having to do a lot of stuff which I wasn’t much good at. I stayed because they seemed to be the one organisation whose perspective went deeper than just the activism, but this, as I’ve said, may be an artifact of being in decline, as there was not much of popular `οι πολλοι one might find in a larger group such as the Labour Party or Greenpeace Supporters at the time. However, I also think there’s a stronger tradition of this in CND and the peace movement generally than there is in other pressure groups. There is a stronger religious component to the membership than elsewhere, and also there are more Marxists, which is a good thing. However, they are to some extent in conflict with anarchists, who tend to consider them too moderate. In particular, Quaker involvement is very strong. All of this means that they are more intellectually-oriented, as can be expected of an organisation whose president was Bertrand Russell. Just briefly, and this deserves more discussion elsewhere, Bertrand Russell is rather a paradoxical figure in his involvement with progressive causes because his motivation was clearly conscience-based, but as a philosopher he was practically an ethical sceptic, i.e. he didn’t really believe right and wrong had any meaning, entailing that had he lived his life authentically he would be a sociopath, but definitely wasn’t. This is extremely odd and is worth going into in greater depth at some stage.

CND has a number of broader involvements than just the issue of unilateral nuclear disarmament. For instance, it supports the Hibakusha (被爆者), i.e. the survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings. As I once ranted on the megaphone in Leicester City Centre, “people not yet born are still dying”, which was one of those things which comes out of your mouth when you’re trying to keep the flow going, but it is kind of true. Damage to chromosomes from ionising radiation to one generation of organisms can increase in future generations even though they’ve never been exposed to that dose, meaning that some of the children and grandchildren of the Hibakusha will be dying of cancer, for example, even if they were born outside Japan. In 1976, one of my teachers said that “fifty years from now there will be children born who will die of cancer from Hiroshima”. This will be true unless some other cataclysm wipes us all out. As OMD said of the Enola Gay, the plane that dropped the bomb, “that kiss you give is never ever gonna fade away”.

I’m not writing this primarily to propagandise although I inevitably will, but I do want to say this. We often think of the Japanese nation as the only direct victims of nuclear weapons, but this is not so. Test sites around the world such as Bikini Atoll and the Nevada Test Site mean that the Marshallese and Western Shoshone nations, for example, are also victims. Whereas they may not have been killed by the blasts of nuclear bombs themselves, their lives have been devastated by them and deaths have resulted. The Western Shoshone found themselves in the ironic position of not being able to find paid employment except in organisations which were destroying their nation, and many of them therefore chose to boycott employers globally.

Another aspect of this is arms conversion. As the Cold War ended, there was supposed to be a peace dividend resulting from the end of the colossal sums of money spent on the likes of Trident. This was not forthcoming because the political system needs us to imagine we have enemies, but trade unions and other organisations investigated the opportunities for manufacturing other products than the subs, warheads and the like which they were oriented towards producing up until the end of the 1980s and found that it was eminently feasible to do so. It was also found, by CAAT, that the efficiency of investment into healthcare and education produced several times the number of jobs investment in arms companies yielded. For instance, four times as many jobs are produced by the equivalent sum of money paid into a school than into the defence industry, where the money mainly goes on expensive equipment. It’s also worth observing at this point that the price of components provided by defence companies to the UK military is vastly inflated, often beyond the realms of reason. This is true across NATO. There are cases of single bolts for sale at retail for less than a dollar going for $5000.

CND is also opposed to fission power, as am I. There is a constant effort to chip away at public opposition to nuclear power which has to be continually renewed when accidents occur. In my opinion the solution to our energy problems is orbital solar power. This has the drawback of the beams being sent back to this planet being very dangerous if they miss their targets and also of the technology for these beams being used for nefarious purposes, but there are straightforward engineering solutions for the former and the latter assumes that human behaviour as it is now is something we’re stuck with. I’m not here to persuade you though.

One of the brutal things members of the public have said to us about Hiroshima and Nagasaki is that two bombs weren’t enough, and that the whole of Japan should’ve been bombed. This assumes that everyone in the country was complicit in the imperialism, torture and other atrocities, and it’s notable that I’ve never heard the same suggested as action against those nicely “Aryan” Germans. In other words, this is nothing but racism. It penetrates far into the alternative community too, as I’ve heard the same sentiments expressed by ageing hippies. I’ve also been called a “traitor”, which is like water off a duck’s back because to me, I just happen to be born in this country and am like everyone else coerced by a monopoly of force to obey the government, so how could I owe anything to my “nation”? The only people I owe that kind of allegiance to is the human race as a whole.

While I’m on the subject of being shouted at in the street, as we all know the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. Before that time, shouting “get back to Russia!” made a minimal bit of sense, but this was still shouted at us well into the twenty-first century, and I think the last time I heard it was probably about twenty years after the end of the Cold War. It isn’t clear to me what someone means when they say this more recently, and to me it advertises that they are not putting any thought into their political position.

The internal machinations of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament are broadly similar to those of any organisation, and it’s remarkable that the same kinds of dynamics and interactions occur across the political spectrum. You might just as well be in the Conservative Party as far as that’s concerned, and it occurs to me that if we are to invent a new way of relating to each other, that might be expected to be reflected in the organisations committed to doing that. It’s no longer an option, and hasn’t been for over six dozen years now, to continue in the same vein as before. To be fair, there are people dedicated to relating differently within such organisations. There’s an elusive political idea in my head which I’ve had for a number of years that the interactions and behaviour we don’t politicise but seem to assume are universal could in some way be extended into the overtly political realm in order to come up with an entirely new form of politics, but as I say I’m very hazy about the nature of this.

Unilateralism is one of those doctrines which appears superficially to be left wing because of tribalism and the adoption of such a policy by the Left. However, if you go back far enough there used to be a Conservative branch of CND and Enoch Powell was a unilateralist. Conversely, if you consider Stalinism to be left wing, the pro-Soviet communist parties in NATO countries would clearly have supported the Soviet Union and its weapon stockpiles. Even the Socialist Workers’ Party in Britain supported retaining nuclear weapons, and their slogan was, famously, “neither Washington nor Moscow but international socialism”. It is not fundamentally a left-wing idea.

The reason the “U”K has nuclear missiles is not in fact to do with defence, or even attack, but because it keeps the country on the UN Security Council. I’ve never understood why the Conservative Party aren’t honest about this because although I don’t agree with it, it does seem to be more defensible than the idea that we have them against a nebulous enemy when suitcase and dirty bombs can easily be used against this country whether or not we have them, and also provide the materials to make them. Although I initially corralled myself into agreement with CND from a left wing position, their policy doesn’t actually have a close connection to left wing politics per se, and in a way it’s odd that a right wing government is happy to throw countless billions of pounds at the defence industry, because that’s the kind of thing you might expect a left wing government to do. But I find myself propagandising again.

Editing the newsletter was a very useful enterprise. At the time, desktop publishing wasn’t the kind of thing most CND members felt willing to wrestle with and there were problems with scale, so this involved spraymounting the edited articles onto boards for reproduction at a local printer. As I was committed to using unbleached paper, the printers used to complain about the colour. We did it all on a typewriter for quite some time and only very slowly did we begin to word process it. You might think that editing would’ve cured me of verbosity and for a while it did, but I find it creeping back in recently and most of what you see me write today will have that flaw. I don’t know why this is but I worry it may be linked to cognitive decline, as the word:idea ratio climbs with the risk of dementia. Very soon after I began, I abandoned spraymount as a potentially nasty sticky stuff which did goodness knows what if you inhaled it and replaced it with Prit Stick. There was an issue with people being rather attached to the way things had always been done, and also problems associated with rather simplistic world views. For instance, some people in the group were opposed to almost any kind of scientific or technological change and often saw it as part of a conspiracy to maintain the status quo. Sometimes it is, but not always.

CND is also something Sarada and I have done together, although Sarada’s attitude has been much more relaxed than mine. One of the biggest difficulties she encountered was when she became treasurer and discovered that her predecessor, who seemed notably disengaged with the whole thing at the best of times, had simply bunged all the receipts for the previous year into a plastic bag which she then had to go through to get the books into an auditable condition. The post of treasurer is always an unpopular one, in that nobody ever wants to do it, and given Sarada’s experience it’s easy to see why.

At times, CND seemed to turn more or less into my “day job” except of course that I wasn’t paid. By this I mean that once you are involved in campaigning, or more broadly working, with something much of the time for years on end you can lose sight and enthusiasm for the cause. Although I still support the cause of unilateral nuclear disarmament, I also find the task of advocating for it quite tedious and tend not to bother much nowadays. It isn’t that I don’t believe in it so much as that all the arguments, responses and counter-arguments have become very routine and tiresome to me, which is a great pity because they are of course vitally important life and death matters. This is a strange juxtaposition because it superimposes apathy and passion. I imagine many people feel this way about what they do.

There is also a question of priority. There’s a sense in which the abolition of weapons of mass destruction trumps all other political issues because it would also be ecocide and there isn’t any point in campaigning for more unionisation or a better NHS if it could all be reduced to cinders at any moment, but likewise there isn’t much point in ignoring civil liberties either since their curtailment could prevent one from standing in the way of a nuclear holocaust either. Most of the time, though, there is a broad consistency across these issues. Voluntary Human Extinction, for example, might sound like a movement which would positively welcome nuclear destruction but in fact the reason most people in VHEMT are in favour of the end of the species is to protect the environment from us, which nuclear war obviously wouldn’t do. I’ve unsuccessfully attempted to come up with a sentence which says something like “nuclear weapons kill without a shot being fired”, which in that form makes no sense, but the very existence of nuclear weapons means that the NHS and all other public projects in this country and around the world are less well-funded and the régimes relying on their existence either economically or directly are not friendly places to live. Mordechai Vanunu comes to mind as a particularly obvious human rights issue here.

It’s probably been roughly a decade since I was involved with CND or the peace movement directly, although I do still go to the Hiroshima vigils. I’m not today, but it’s Friday and my life is rather limited anyway. If you want to think of it as parallel to a career, I ended up on the board of East Midlands CND and might have got further if certain other issues hadn’t impinged, notably the “Labour” government’s attack on home education and complementary medicine at the end of the ‘noughties. Consequently I haven’t done much in recent years, but it’s impossible to be involved so heavily in something for two decades without it having an impact on one’s life and being significant.

Naturally the reason I’m blogging about this today is that it’s the seventy-sixth anniversary of Hiroshima, and we must never forget that atrocity. This must never happen again: